News claims, verified against the record.

Primary sources only. No repetition. Free tier now open.

Create Free Account – No Card NeededView Pricing

🎉 New users: Get your first month free on the Annual plan with code ARCANNUAL2 — limited to 10 redemptions, expires April 30. Perfect for testing the full database, re-verifications, and 100 claims/month.

After the free month, your plan automatically renews at $99/year. Cancel anytime.

Recent Verifications

Missile claim screenshot

“The missile fragments found at the Shajareh Tayyebeh girls' school are from a U.S.-made Tomahawk missile.”

Reported, Not Independently Confirmed85/100Narrative Framing

No official government press release or primary document confirmed the missile origin. Expert analysis and media reports were found, but primary evidence requirements were not met.

Duwaji claim screenshot

“There were subsequent revelations of pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel posts Duwaji had shared and liked.”

Confirmed by Independent Sources50/100Other · 90% confidence

Multiple independent outlets documented specific social media posts. Instance-based verification confirmed at least one occurrence.

jewishinsider.comnypost.com ×2
Russia drones claim screenshot

“Russia fired almost 400 long-range drones at Ukraine overnight.”

Reported, Not Independently Confirmed100/100Other

High verifiability score but no official Ukrainian government statement or military press release confirming the specific count was located. Primary evidence requirement not met.

Outlet Verification History

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

100.0%Accuracy

Based on 1 verified claim

N/ANarrative Sourcing

bbc.com

bbc.com

72.0%Accuracy

Based on 5 verified claims

N/ANarrative Sourcing

cnn.com

cnn.com

48.1%Accuracy

Based on 338 verified claims

N/ANarrative Sourcing

apnews.com

apnews.com

46.9%Accuracy

Based on 29 verified claims

65.0%Narrative Sourcing

foxnews.com

foxnews.com

33.3%Accuracy

Based on 6 verified claims

N/ANarrative Sourcing

census.gov

census.gov

30.0%Accuracy

Based on 1 verified claim

85.0%Narrative Sourcing

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

30.0%Accuracy

Based on 2 verified claims

N/ANarrative Sourcing

gov.uk

gov.uk

30.0%Accuracy

Based on 1 verified claim

N/ANarrative Sourcing

linkedin.com

linkedin.com

30.0%Accuracy

Based on 1 verified claim

N/ANarrative Sourcing

nbcnews.com

nbcnews.com

30.0%Accuracy

Based on 1 verified claim

N/ANarrative Sourcing

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

30.0%Accuracy

Based on 1 verified claim

N/ANarrative Sourcing

2021-2025.state.gov

2021-2025.state.gov

30.0%Accuracy

Based on 1 verified claim

N/ANarrative Sourcing

theguardian.com

theguardian.com

30.0%Accuracy

Based on 4 verified claims

N/ANarrative Sourcing

www.popsci.com

popsci.com

30.0%Accuracy

Based on 2 verified claims

N/ANarrative Sourcing

nature.com

nature.com

28.0%Accuracy

Based on 5 verified claims

N/ANarrative Sourcing

republicworld.com

republicworld.com

0.0%Accuracy

Based on 1 verified claim

N/ANarrative Sourcing

How It Works

The Arc-Hives Index analyzes factual claims in news reporting and tracks whether they can actually be confirmed against primary source documentation.

Primary Sources, Not Repetition

We don't verify a claim by counting how many outlets reported it. We look for the document, transcript, or official record that would confirm it. If that evidence doesn't exist, the claim stays unverified.

Evidence Trails, Not Just Verdicts

Every analysis shows you exactly what sources were consulted, what evidence was found, and why the verdict was reached. You can follow the reasoning yourself.

History That Doesn't Disappear

Claims are stored permanently. If new evidence surfaces, a new analysis is added — the old one stays. You can see how a story's factual record has evolved over time.

How to read the accuracy score

Score RangeMeaning
80–100Claims are usually verifiable with primary or official evidence.
60–79Claims are often verifiable, but some lack sufficient confirmation.
40–59Claims frequently rely on weak or non-confirmatory evidence.
Below 40Claims are often contradicted by official records or remain consistently unverifiable.

Why this is different

Most systems ask: “Has anyone else reported this?”
Arc-Hives asks: “What must be true for this claim to hold — and is that confirmed?”

A claim can be repeated across dozens of outlets and still have no primary source backing it. “Unverifiable” doesn't mean false — it means the evidence required to confirm it doesn't exist in the record yet.

Legal clarity (important)

The Arc-Hives Index:

The Arc-Hives Index evaluates claims, not people or institutions. Results are evidence-based, time-bound, and may change as new primary documentation becomes available.